<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Has Skype Won The War?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shotofjaq.org/2010/01/has-skype-won-the-war/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shotofjaq.org/2010/01/has-skype-won-the-war/</link>
	<description>Ten minutes of short, sharp, informed, and funny comment about the open source world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:30:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://shotofjaq.org/2010/01/has-skype-won-the-war/comment-page-1/#comment-2055</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 03:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shotofjaq.org/?p=272#comment-2055</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Nobody mentionned sflphone.org
It&#039;s not the usual &quot;buddy-list centric&quot; application (though I guess it could work that way, haven&#039;t tried). I use it to do calls to the POTS (ie: landlines or cellphones) all around the world, from my computers.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It has a GTK+ and a QT interface, and it is designed to work with pulseaudio.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Beats Twinkle hands down.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody mentionned sflphone.org
It&#8217;s not the usual &#8220;buddy-list centric&#8221; application (though I guess it could work that way, haven&#8217;t tried). I use it to do calls to the POTS (ie: landlines or cellphones) all around the world, from my computers.</p>

<p>It has a GTK+ and a QT interface, and it is designed to work with pulseaudio.</p>

<p>Beats Twinkle hands down.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akumria</title>
		<link>http://shotofjaq.org/2010/01/has-skype-won-the-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1631</link>
		<dc:creator>akumria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 17:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shotofjaq.org/?p=272#comment-1631</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Bah.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A 10 minute story on how difficult it was to setup VoIP a few years ago.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yes, Linux was hard to configure too. In the past.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Frankly - Skype does &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; work out of the box (on Ubunutu you need to be using the beta version, which uses PulseAudio, or disable PulseAudio -- neither of which are &quot;plug n&#039; play&quot;).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also annoying was the whole &quot;Arguing in Agreement&quot; aspect of this show. It would have been more interesting if someone was on the &#039;for&#039; side and someone on the &#039;against&#039; side.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bah.</p>

<p>A 10 minute story on how difficult it was to setup VoIP a few years ago.</p>

<p>Yes, Linux was hard to configure too. In the past.</p>

<p>Frankly &#8211; Skype does <em>not</em> work out of the box (on Ubunutu you need to be using the beta version, which uses PulseAudio, or disable PulseAudio &#8212; neither of which are &#8220;plug n&#8217; play&#8221;).</p>

<p>Also annoying was the whole &#8220;Arguing in Agreement&#8221; aspect of this show. It would have been more interesting if someone was on the &#8216;for&#8217; side and someone on the &#8216;against&#8217; side.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madman</title>
		<link>http://shotofjaq.org/2010/01/has-skype-won-the-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1562</link>
		<dc:creator>Madman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 21:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shotofjaq.org/?p=272#comment-1562</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;So I use Skype quite frequently, I like it, and I don&#039;t really have any qualms with the Skype team or their choices, but one thing continually annoys me: the internet is so inconsistent with this kind of thing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In my perfect, ideal world, all internet communication protocols would be similar to E-mail in behaviour. We&#039;d just have an incoming and outgoing server, a username and password, and we&#039;d be good. We could contact anyone using any client from any other server without headaches and neck-pains: just claim you want to phone somebody@somedomain.com and maybe add them to your contact list.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Is that as easy as Skype? No, you still need to enter your incoming and outgoing servers. Still, if ISPs provided these, as well as perhaps similar instant-messaging(Jabber/XMMP) accounts, the same way they do E-mails (and hell, maybe even roll all of them into one account), nobody would complain. It wouldn&#039;t be a case of needing to install Skype, Windows Live Messenger, Google Talk/Chat and possibly Thunderbird or similar for E-mail, then needing anyone you want to talk to to have all these programs installed and an account at all these service providers. Just one nice&#039;n&#039;easy E-mail account that you can IM and call as well.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My $0.02.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I use Skype quite frequently, I like it, and I don&#8217;t really have any qualms with the Skype team or their choices, but one thing continually annoys me: the internet is so inconsistent with this kind of thing.</p>

<p>In my perfect, ideal world, all internet communication protocols would be similar to E-mail in behaviour. We&#8217;d just have an incoming and outgoing server, a username and password, and we&#8217;d be good. We could contact anyone using any client from any other server without headaches and neck-pains: just claim you want to phone <a href="mailto:somebody@somedomain.com">somebody@somedomain.com</a> and maybe add them to your contact list.</p>

<p>Is that as easy as Skype? No, you still need to enter your incoming and outgoing servers. Still, if ISPs provided these, as well as perhaps similar instant-messaging(Jabber/XMMP) accounts, the same way they do E-mails (and hell, maybe even roll all of them into one account), nobody would complain. It wouldn&#8217;t be a case of needing to install Skype, Windows Live Messenger, Google Talk/Chat and possibly Thunderbird or similar for E-mail, then needing anyone you want to talk to to have all these programs installed and an account at all these service providers. Just one nice&#8217;n'easy E-mail account that you can IM and call as well.</p>

<p>My $0.02.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skype and Gnome Dark Themes &#171; Mike&#39;s Planet</title>
		<link>http://shotofjaq.org/2010/01/has-skype-won-the-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1560</link>
		<dc:creator>Skype and Gnome Dark Themes &#171; Mike&#39;s Planet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shotofjaq.org/?p=272#comment-1560</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] more disucssion on Skype and Open Source, I suggest listening to the Shot of Jaq podcast episode: Has Skype Won the War?   Share and [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more disucssion on Skype and Open Source, I suggest listening to the Shot of Jaq podcast episode: Has Skype Won the War?   Share and [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dobey</title>
		<link>http://shotofjaq.org/2010/01/has-skype-won-the-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1552</link>
		<dc:creator>dobey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shotofjaq.org/?p=272#comment-1552</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Most applications are reading /etc/passwd. It&#039;s where your &quot;real name&quot; and such are, and simple API calls everyone uses to automatically fill in &quot;Name&quot; fields and such in apps, to make the UI nicer, hit /etc/passwd to get that.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;AFAIK, that&#039;s all it was ever doing, using the standard APIs for getting user info out of the sytem.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most applications are reading /etc/passwd. It&#8217;s where your &#8220;real name&#8221; and such are, and simple API calls everyone uses to automatically fill in &#8220;Name&#8221; fields and such in apps, to make the UI nicer, hit /etc/passwd to get that.</p>

<p>AFAIK, that&#8217;s all it was ever doing, using the standard APIs for getting user info out of the sytem.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VulcanRidr</title>
		<link>http://shotofjaq.org/2010/01/has-skype-won-the-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1543</link>
		<dc:creator>VulcanRidr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shotofjaq.org/?p=272#comment-1543</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The thing I really don&#039;t like about Skype and closed protocols is that you really don&#039;t know what is going on under the covers. I remember a story years ago about how Skype accessed /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow on the box on which it is running. Now I can&#039;t come up with a decent reason for it to do that. Actually, I can come up with several reasons, but thanks to my tinfoil-hat, security engineer nature, most of them are nefarious. At some points, it is better to avoid the path of least resistance and go through the pain of setting up the more difficult alternative.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;After all, the easy path would include running Internet Explorer, which thanks to the Chinese &quot;Operation Aurora&quot; is contraindicated.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing I really don&#8217;t like about Skype and closed protocols is that you really don&#8217;t know what is going on under the covers. I remember a story years ago about how Skype accessed /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow on the box on which it is running. Now I can&#8217;t come up with a decent reason for it to do that. Actually, I can come up with several reasons, but thanks to my tinfoil-hat, security engineer nature, most of them are nefarious. At some points, it is better to avoid the path of least resistance and go through the pain of setting up the more difficult alternative.</p>

<p>After all, the easy path would include running Internet Explorer, which thanks to the Chinese &#8220;Operation Aurora&#8221; is contraindicated.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brucevdk</title>
		<link>http://shotofjaq.org/2010/01/has-skype-won-the-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1487</link>
		<dc:creator>brucevdk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shotofjaq.org/?p=272#comment-1487</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;And herein lies the problem, as you say: &quot;Most gateway implementations rely on the proprietary vendor [...] At that point, we’re entirely in their hands&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And herein lies the problem, as you say: &#8220;Most gateway implementations rely on the proprietary vendor [...] At that point, we’re entirely in their hands&#8221;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brucevdk</title>
		<link>http://shotofjaq.org/2010/01/has-skype-won-the-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1486</link>
		<dc:creator>brucevdk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shotofjaq.org/?p=272#comment-1486</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Both TeamSpeak and Ventrilo are server based, meaning somebody hosts a server and you join it (it&#039;s somewhat comparable to IRC). However, there&#039;s no global user directory and there&#039;s no way to contact individual users.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t really understand the &quot;high quality&quot; reference, that all depends on the codec that is used. The highest quality setting for Ventrilo is: Speex (32 KHz, 16 bit, 10 Qlty) 5520 bytes/sec&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;While both TeamSpeak and Ventrilo are descent clients, there isn&#039;t really anything special. The most important features are that:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;1) Everybody can host their own server 
  2) It has support for channels (trees)
  3) You can bind voice communication to a key (or use voice activation)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s not exactly rocket science ;-)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both TeamSpeak and Ventrilo are server based, meaning somebody hosts a server and you join it (it&#8217;s somewhat comparable to IRC). However, there&#8217;s no global user directory and there&#8217;s no way to contact individual users.</p>

<p>I don&#8217;t really understand the &#8220;high quality&#8221; reference, that all depends on the codec that is used. The highest quality setting for Ventrilo is: Speex (32 KHz, 16 bit, 10 Qlty) 5520 bytes/sec</p>

<p>While both TeamSpeak and Ventrilo are descent clients, there isn&#8217;t really anything special. The most important features are that:</p>

<p>1) Everybody can host their own server 
  2) It has support for channels (trees)
  3) You can bind voice communication to a key (or use voice activation)</p>

<p>It&#8217;s not exactly rocket science <img src='http://shotofjaq.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sil</title>
		<link>http://shotofjaq.org/2010/01/has-skype-won-the-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1479</link>
		<dc:creator>sil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 08:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shotofjaq.org/?p=272#comment-1479</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ah, good call. I personally don&#039;t know much about the gaming VoIP approaches, so that&#039;s useful. Can you use TeamSpeak to just call people up for conversations, outside the context of a multiplayer game?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, good call. I personally don&#8217;t know much about the gaming VoIP approaches, so that&#8217;s useful. Can you use TeamSpeak to just call people up for conversations, outside the context of a multiplayer game?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: werelord</title>
		<link>http://shotofjaq.org/2010/01/has-skype-won-the-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1478</link>
		<dc:creator>werelord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 08:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shotofjaq.org/?p=272#comment-1478</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Little late to the conversation, but meh..&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You guys mentioned that you&#039;re not too aware of what other tech is similar to skype.. and I see no mention of Ventrilo or Teamspeak in the discussion here.. These are generally used in the gaming sphere; unfortunately not open source and not extremely user friendly, but do have the ability to host high quality VOIP bitstreams..&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Little late to the conversation, but meh..</p>

<p>You guys mentioned that you&#8217;re not too aware of what other tech is similar to skype.. and I see no mention of Ventrilo or Teamspeak in the discussion here.. These are generally used in the gaming sphere; unfortunately not open source and not extremely user friendly, but do have the ability to host high quality VOIP bitstreams..</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Jones</title>
		<link>http://shotofjaq.org/2010/01/has-skype-won-the-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1454</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 19:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shotofjaq.org/?p=272#comment-1454</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t think that skype has won the game, unless you are talking the perception game and that, really, is more of a single hurdle than the whole game.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For the general public, skype has made the idea of making voice calls over the Internet understandable. They have done that by making it zero-configurable and anticipating, then working around, the problems that the general public would have in making such calls. As you said, they made it just work. More importantly, I suspect that was their operating mantra.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think it is possible for an open source project to still enter and flourish in this space. They just need to make the mantra &quot;configurable, but usable with sensible defaults&quot; their operating principle.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If they learn that lesson from Skype, they will thrive. Whether they &quot;beat&quot; skype at that point is somewhat moot. Skype does some stuff amazingly well, but there are surely niches that can be exploited by an open source VOIP solution that just works (and if you don&#039;t like the defaults, it&#039;s easy to get other options working as well).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that skype has won the game, unless you are talking the perception game and that, really, is more of a single hurdle than the whole game.</p>

<p>For the general public, skype has made the idea of making voice calls over the Internet understandable. They have done that by making it zero-configurable and anticipating, then working around, the problems that the general public would have in making such calls. As you said, they made it just work. More importantly, I suspect that was their operating mantra.</p>

<p>I think it is possible for an open source project to still enter and flourish in this space. They just need to make the mantra &#8220;configurable, but usable with sensible defaults&#8221; their operating principle.</p>

<p>If they learn that lesson from Skype, they will thrive. Whether they &#8220;beat&#8221; skype at that point is somewhat moot. Skype does some stuff amazingly well, but there are surely niches that can be exploited by an open source VOIP solution that just works (and if you don&#8217;t like the defaults, it&#8217;s easy to get other options working as well).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake T</title>
		<link>http://shotofjaq.org/2010/01/has-skype-won-the-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1452</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shotofjaq.org/?p=272#comment-1452</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Skype hasn&#039;t won the war as far as I&#039;m concerned. and here&#039;s why:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;4 years ago, my brother was living in China. I was in the US and only had a dial-up connection. We tried to use Skype--it was a disaster.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Then we tried Google Voice. It worked flawlessly.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Whether or not that&#039;s a massive selling point, I don&#039;t know.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What I do know is that, in my mind, Google Voice (audio over jabber?) is the superior solution.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Of course, I tried to hit somebody up via Empathy with it the other day (me on Ubuntu &amp; Empathy, them on XP &amp; Gmail) and it failed.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Maybe things have changed in the last 4 years ;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skype hasn&#8217;t won the war as far as I&#8217;m concerned. and here&#8217;s why:</p>

<p>4 years ago, my brother was living in China. I was in the US and only had a dial-up connection. We tried to use Skype&#8211;it was a disaster.</p>

<p>Then we tried Google Voice. It worked flawlessly.</p>

<p>Whether or not that&#8217;s a massive selling point, I don&#8217;t know.</p>

<p>What I do know is that, in my mind, Google Voice (audio over jabber?) is the superior solution.</p>

<p>Of course, I tried to hit somebody up via Empathy with it the other day (me on Ubuntu &amp; Empathy, them on XP &amp; Gmail) and it failed.</p>

<p>Maybe things have changed in the last 4 years <img src='http://shotofjaq.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sil</title>
		<link>http://shotofjaq.org/2010/01/has-skype-won-the-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1274</link>
		<dc:creator>sil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shotofjaq.org/?p=272#comment-1274</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Someone makes a SIP client that works as easily as Skype, I&#039;ll happily use it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone makes a SIP client that works as easily as Skype, I&#8217;ll happily use it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael "Press release" Howell</title>
		<link>http://shotofjaq.org/2010/01/has-skype-won-the-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1273</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael "Press release" Howell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shotofjaq.org/?p=272#comment-1273</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Skype will win the war if they don&#039;t sit on their butts. If they fix the 4-person limit on conversations, or introduce IRC-style public chat, they&#039;ll win.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Otherwise, someone could come in and fill a niche Skype does not. e.g. Internet press conferences&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skype will win the war if they don&#8217;t sit on their butts. If they fix the 4-person limit on conversations, or introduce IRC-style public chat, they&#8217;ll win.</p>

<p>Otherwise, someone could come in and fill a niche Skype does not. e.g. Internet press conferences</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sil</title>
		<link>http://shotofjaq.org/2010/01/has-skype-won-the-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1270</link>
		<dc:creator>sil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shotofjaq.org/?p=272#comment-1270</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ah, you&#039;re confusing me with the LugRadio me. In situations where the open source alternatives are hopelessly rubbish by comparison, like Skype, I&#039;ll use Skype. I&#039;ve mellowed a bit in recent years.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, you&#8217;re confusing me with the LugRadio me. In situations where the open source alternatives are hopelessly rubbish by comparison, like Skype, I&#8217;ll use Skype. I&#8217;ve mellowed a bit in recent years.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Duncan</title>
		<link>http://shotofjaq.org/2010/01/has-skype-won-the-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1269</link>
		<dc:creator>James Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shotofjaq.org/?p=272#comment-1269</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It won&#039;t IMO, for precisely that reason. The users would go to whoever offered free calls, and Google is already starting to affect them with Google Talk.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It won&#8217;t IMO, for precisely that reason. The users would go to whoever offered free calls, and Google is already starting to affect them with Google Talk.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Duncan</title>
		<link>http://shotofjaq.org/2010/01/has-skype-won-the-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1268</link>
		<dc:creator>James Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shotofjaq.org/?p=272#comment-1268</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you. Best. Tip. Ever. Ubuntu Netbook Remix default theme works in Skype again!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you. Best. Tip. Ever. Ubuntu Netbook Remix default theme works in Skype again!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Duncan</title>
		<link>http://shotofjaq.org/2010/01/has-skype-won-the-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1267</link>
		<dc:creator>James Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shotofjaq.org/?p=272#comment-1267</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Are you US based? I&#039;m very curious about the details of your setup, as I&#039;m about to dump voice service on my mobile in favour of just data.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you US based? I&#8217;m very curious about the details of your setup, as I&#8217;m about to dump voice service on my mobile in favour of just data.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Duncan</title>
		<link>http://shotofjaq.org/2010/01/has-skype-won-the-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1266</link>
		<dc:creator>James Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shotofjaq.org/?p=272#comment-1266</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah...which means that we are always essentially going to be coding shims. It&#039;s at best a moderately painful compromise, especially when the binary blob is both a security risk and something that can be dropped at any point by Skype.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah&#8230;which means that we are always essentially going to be coding shims. It&#8217;s at best a moderately painful compromise, especially when the binary blob is both a security risk and something that can be dropped at any point by Skype.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sil</title>
		<link>http://shotofjaq.org/2010/01/has-skype-won-the-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1264</link>
		<dc:creator>sil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shotofjaq.org/?p=272#comment-1264</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;They&#039;re opening the client UI, but not the client protocol, so people will be able to build their own client which uses the closed Skype daemon to do the communication.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re opening the client UI, but not the client protocol, so people will be able to build their own client which uses the closed Skype daemon to do the communication.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Duncan</title>
		<link>http://shotofjaq.org/2010/01/has-skype-won-the-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1263</link>
		<dc:creator>James Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shotofjaq.org/?p=272#comment-1263</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Seconded. A shot on the process of productisation (maybe with some insights from Canonical) would be excellent.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seconded. A shot on the process of productisation (maybe with some insights from Canonical) would be excellent.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Duncan</title>
		<link>http://shotofjaq.org/2010/01/has-skype-won-the-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1262</link>
		<dc:creator>James Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shotofjaq.org/?p=272#comment-1262</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This is an unusual change from your usual love of FOSS and open standards, Aq.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an unusual change from your usual love of FOSS and open standards, Aq.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Duncan</title>
		<link>http://shotofjaq.org/2010/01/has-skype-won-the-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1261</link>
		<dc:creator>James Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shotofjaq.org/?p=272#comment-1261</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m about to go data-only for my mobile phone and get my call termination through a sipgate standard geographical number. Cheaper for my callers, cheaper for me.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m about to go data-only for my mobile phone and get my call termination through a sipgate standard geographical number. Cheaper for my callers, cheaper for me.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Duncan</title>
		<link>http://shotofjaq.org/2010/01/has-skype-won-the-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1260</link>
		<dc:creator>James Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shotofjaq.org/?p=272#comment-1260</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;They won&#039;t, naturally. They have to control the client or it becomes far far too easy to make an ad-free, Skype relationship free version.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They won&#8217;t, naturally. They have to control the client or it becomes far far too easy to make an ad-free, Skype relationship free version.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Duncan</title>
		<link>http://shotofjaq.org/2010/01/has-skype-won-the-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1259</link>
		<dc:creator>James Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shotofjaq.org/?p=272#comment-1259</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, network effect is a killer. It&#039;s that that will lock in Skype, at least until Google Voice/VoIP kills them. Look at Windows, for example - apparently good enough.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, network effect is a killer. It&#8217;s that that will lock in Skype, at least until Google Voice/VoIP kills them. Look at Windows, for example &#8211; apparently good enough.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
